|
imr4198
Apr 27, 2011 15:13:25 GMT -5
Post by rmclaughlin on Apr 27, 2011 15:13:25 GMT -5
After looking at the load info I bought some imr 4198.I could not find any Hodgkins.Will the fps listed on the info sheet be close to the same for each powder? I am thinking about 55 grains of IMR4198 with blue Harvestor sabots ,195 expanders.Should this make a good 45cal load? If it ever stops raining for a day i am ready to shoot .
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 27, 2011 18:57:38 GMT -5
Post by hunter on Apr 27, 2011 18:57:38 GMT -5
I beleive that imr 4198 is a little hotter than h4198. i would use 2 grains less of the imr4198 compared to h4198.
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 27, 2011 19:03:17 GMT -5
Post by Richard on Apr 27, 2011 19:03:17 GMT -5
I would beg to differ with Hunter. I have always found HODGEDON's 4198 to be hotter than IMR's version. I just shot 62 gr. of H-4198 with a 155 gr. bullet and only got 2350 fps. If you go back into some of my loads, I did a comparrison some time back and H was hotter than IMR. There is enough infomation in the loads section with H-4198 that you should be able to do a comparrison. Richard
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
imr4198
Apr 27, 2011 19:28:53 GMT -5
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2011 19:28:53 GMT -5
Richard is correct, If I remember correctly I had to use approx 2 grains more Imr to get the same speeds as H
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 27, 2011 19:37:19 GMT -5
Post by hunter on Apr 27, 2011 19:37:19 GMT -5
I stand corrected. Thanks for keeping me straight. I knew one was a little hotter than the other. I got them backwards.
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 27, 2011 19:48:40 GMT -5
Post by tar12 on Apr 27, 2011 19:48:40 GMT -5
I did not chrono this load but shot it enough to know it is repeatable and accurate.
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 28, 2011 7:27:37 GMT -5
Post by edge on Apr 28, 2011 7:27:37 GMT -5
IMR 4198 is a bit bulkier than H4198 and produces a bit less pressure and velocity.
60 grains of H4198 takes up about 69.3 grains of H2O and IMR 4198 takes up about 72.6
edge.
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 28, 2011 8:16:57 GMT -5
Post by rmclaughlin on Apr 28, 2011 8:16:57 GMT -5
Thanks to all for your help.
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 28, 2011 11:06:21 GMT -5
Post by chuck41 on Apr 28, 2011 11:06:21 GMT -5
Some of us have found it is a bit harder to ignite than the "H" variety. I had several failures to ignite with my 50 using the "IMR" variety. Not sure whether this post is about 50 or 45. Probably not a problem with the faster pressure building of the 45.
In my case the primer would "pop" and the unburned granules of the powder would be left as a waxy looking residue, almost intact but with the dark coating on the outside burned off. Bullet would hit the ground about 20 - 30 yards away.
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 28, 2011 11:30:07 GMT -5
Post by edge on Apr 28, 2011 11:30:07 GMT -5
SNIP. Bullet would hit the ground about 20 - 30 yards away. You generally look for short range loads but that seems a bit extreme even for you ;D ;D edge.
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 28, 2011 13:27:02 GMT -5
Post by rmclaughlin on Apr 28, 2011 13:27:02 GMT -5
Tar 12 what was the bullet/sabot combo (nice group)
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 28, 2011 19:59:36 GMT -5
Post by tar12 on Apr 28, 2011 19:59:36 GMT -5
Tar 12 what was the bullet/sabot combo (nice group) .40 cal barnes 195,blue harvester,Fed 209A primer
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 29, 2011 6:57:40 GMT -5
Post by herman on Apr 29, 2011 6:57:40 GMT -5
Just tried 65 grs of IMR 4198 back in march to compare with 64 grs of H,and got pretty close to the same speed with one grain more of IMR than H. 200sst gave 2795,2790and 2779 for avg of 2788fps useing the IMR at 65 grs. The ES was pretty low also at 16/8.3 At 100 yds they both shot the same also.
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 30, 2011 9:04:32 GMT -5
Post by chuck41 on Apr 30, 2011 9:04:32 GMT -5
SNIP. Bullet would hit the ground about 20 - 30 yards away. You generally look for short range loads but that seems a bit extreme even for you ;D ;D edge. Penetration wasn't very good either. Only about 1/8" of dirt. But can't complain about accuracy, it hit that dirt every time.
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 30, 2011 10:40:19 GMT -5
Post by rossman40 on Apr 30, 2011 10:40:19 GMT -5
You have to remember where Hodgdon started from. Bruce Hodgdon bought and resold "surplus" powders which were sold from war reserves or lots that didn't make the grade. It wasn't till the late 60s early 70s that he had to buy "new" powders. And then when he took samples to have anaylized it was old powder so that is why the burn rates do not match exactly. I have heard stories of Bruce mixing powders on a tarp in a garage to get the proper/close to burn rate. The only powder Hodgdon actually makes is the BP subs.
You also have to remember that the IMR powders were a standard of the military around the free world and DuPont's factories in the US, Canada, Australia and I think Brazil and S. Africa cranked them out till the switch to ball powders in WWII. Not to mention the mysterious ties with the European powder companies. Now the only plants left from the DuPont dynasty is the Valleyfield, Canada plant owned by General Dynamics, Australian Defense Industries, now owned by Thales. If you want ball powder the only plant left in the US is the St. Marks plant in Florida which is also owned by General Dynamics. Alliant Powders in Radford, Virgina is the only other powder plant left in North America. Supposedly the Black Mag powders were made at a General Dynamics plant in Moses Lake, WA that makes specialized stuff like rocket propellant and air bag components.
Even the Western Powders (Accurate, Blackhorn 209 and Ramshot) are made in one of the 3 North American plants or Europe. Some of the Alliant powders are made by Norma/Bofors in Sweden.
|
|
|
imr4198
Apr 30, 2011 14:15:20 GMT -5
Post by Jon on Apr 30, 2011 14:15:20 GMT -5
Rossman. Very informative. Thank you.
|
|