|
|
Post by cumminscowboy on Mar 17, 2009 15:56:19 GMT -5
I was wondering if these bullets shoot any differently, they look the same externally, any other differences
|
|
|
|
Post by Chris Champion on Mar 17, 2009 16:05:20 GMT -5
The 250g Shockwave/SST shoots better in my gun than the 250g Bonded Shockwave by a considerable margin at speeds ranging from 2200 to almost 2700 fps. Have not tried the 300 Bonded but the unbonded 300's shoot well too.
|
|
|
|
Post by broomebuck on Mar 17, 2009 19:11:57 GMT -5
in my gun with the 300gr the bonded sw shot 2inchs lower than the 300gr sst. i recovered a 300gr bsw out of a deer this year held up good it weighed 271 gr and some change, i dont know the speed but i use 67 grains of imr 4198
|
|
|
|
Post by Dave W on Mar 17, 2009 19:52:22 GMT -5
Seems like most of the old posts on the old board claimed better accuracy with the regular 250 at longer distance.
|
|
|
|
Post by smitty on Mar 18, 2009 8:45:11 GMT -5
I primarily use 300gr bullets and have had a little better accuracy with the non bonded bullets. But I'm talking an inch or less at 100 yards when comparing groups. The bonded ones due stay together better but both have anchored every deer I've used them on. IMO the bonded sst or barnes bullets are better choices for a 250gr bullet and your fast velocities.
smitty
|
|
|
|
Post by raf on Mar 18, 2009 22:36:49 GMT -5
I use both the 250 SST and bonded SW. They both shoot the same IMO. Better terminal preformance from the bonded SW though.
|
|
