|
|
Post by wilmsmeyer on Mar 9, 2009 18:35:39 GMT -5
Wow Youp50!
That is the ugliest gun I've ever seen. Uglier then mine!!
DBinNY....now you have someone else to pick on. Geeeez. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Harley on Mar 9, 2009 18:46:34 GMT -5
I don't think anyone would even STEAL that rifle.
Harley
|
|
|
|
Post by huntingmike on Mar 9, 2009 20:53:11 GMT -5
Sims recoil pad. Barrel clearance on the syn. stock.
|
|
|
|
Post by willscarlet on Mar 9, 2009 21:36:19 GMT -5
That's a GREAT one ikantski, .......even your name sounds Polish!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by youp50 on Mar 10, 2009 2:21:56 GMT -5
I figured some would appreciate it. ;D My cheek bone sure did.
For the aspiring connoisseur of duct tape, the first layer gets wrapped on sticky side out. The adhesive cannot adhere to the stock that way.
|
|
|
|
Post by rbinar on Mar 10, 2009 4:48:23 GMT -5
why does the gun need a 3rd pillar There is no absolute need. It makes things easier to deal with in many cases because you never have to take the action down even to clean. Some have designed tools that do essentially the same but many have found their rifle takes to bedding. Since the pillar can be added while bedding for about what the tool(s) cost some elect the pillar. |
|
|
|
Post by DBinNY on Mar 10, 2009 9:54:33 GMT -5
Wow Youp50! That is the ugliest gun I've ever seen. Uglier then mine!! DBinNY....now you have someone else to pick on. Geeeez. ;D Wilms, I saw that picture and immediately thought of you. I'm in agreement that function is far more important than aesthetics. I might also suggest that people try shooting their guns before they dive head over heels into modifications. They might be pleasantly surprised. I do not doubt that in many cases modifications are beneficial but I'd also argue that in some cases may not be worth it from a practical standpoint. If it makes you happy then go ahead and do it! |
|
