|
Post by eml9 on Aug 9, 2015 20:42:59 GMT -5
I have had a few scopes where power setting did affect poi and some scopes that did not ? Anyone no why ?
|
|
|
Post by 7mmfreak on Aug 10, 2015 12:54:34 GMT -5
Were they SFP?
|
|
|
Post by Jon on Aug 10, 2015 15:06:22 GMT -5
SFP and FFP affect scopes differently.
|
|
|
Post by eml9 on Aug 11, 2015 7:19:34 GMT -5
Yes they were ... Did some research on it have a better understanding now ... So a ffp scope should never be affected by different power settings unless something is wrong with the scope ..correct?
|
|
|
Post by rossman40 on Aug 11, 2015 10:36:54 GMT -5
What you run into is with a variable power scope the two lens sets in the erector tube move to change the magnification.
On a SFP scope, since the lenses are in front of the reticle, any variance in the focal plane of a individual lens or (a term used by scope makers) columnation of lenses, will shift the image in relation to the reticle. On a FFP reticle scope the lenses that move are behind the reticle so there is no shift.
In the old days that is why target scopes were always fixed magnification. They didn't even use turrets, external adjustment, so no erector,
Manufacturing has improved and the internals of a high end scope looks like this,
To check a scope one smith I knew had this huge vise mounted on what he said was a forging anvil, basicly a chunk of steel that weighed over 2000lb. He had a mount on another chunk that he would clamp in the vise and put the scope on it and then set-up a grid target out side the shop. then he would run the scope thru the mag range and watch for shift.
Sometimes recoil will make a lens shift just the slightest. This has been called reticle "float". When the Army was spec'ing scopes, even though they were fixed power, they were spec'ed with FFP reticles to cut down on the chance of float. But you have to look at that when you look at the overall probability of error or dispersion (group size).
|
|
|
Post by eml9 on Aug 12, 2015 13:52:07 GMT -5
Thanks for the explanation rossman .. I'm getting it now ..
Eric
|
|