|
Post by TGinPA on Mar 1, 2011 13:29:49 GMT -5
Pressure Trace: PN45 N120 65gr 200xtp Gage and Module Manufacturer = RSI USB model Trigger Sensitivity = 2, Strain Gage Voltage =4.9 Gage Factor =2.1 PSI Correction Factor: 0 Barrel Temp = 64 degrees F. measured at the sensor (IR). Rifle Stand: Caldwell Lead Sled Altitude: 450 ft Chronograph: Chrony Alpha Model 8 ft from muzzle. (8 fps added to all recorded velocities to correct for distance of chrony from muzzle.) Barrel Type: PacNor .45 Cal Muzzleloader Barrel OD = 1.06 in Barrel ID = .452 Breech Plug:Savage Std. (screw-in ventliner) ventliner orifice .033 in. Sensor dist fm BP=1.1 in. Bullet Diam.= .458 in. Bullet Type = Hornady 10mm 200gr xtp. Bullet weight = 200gr. ,unknurled. Sabot: Harvester Smooth Blue (9gr) Powder: N120 65gr. Primer:Fed 209 Shot fm dirty barrel. Increasing the load might decrease the secondary spike. But, since the initial peak pressure which would increase if the powder load were increased, is already approaching the sabot disruption threshold, as a single powder load, 65 gr. may be close to a maximal load for this powder with a sabotted 200gr bullet. I was unable to recover the sabot. This load seemed safe in my barrel under the conditions of the test but may not be under other conditions. TG
|
|
|
Post by tar12 on Mar 1, 2011 13:54:38 GMT -5
Thanks TG. Zen was experiencing sabot disruption in temps as low as 30 degrees with 65 grn plus loads with out a barrel cooler.Based on this I am going to work up to 64 grns and see how this plays out. I do not know if I will improve upon the accuracy or not as it is very accurate at 60 grns.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 1, 2011 14:09:48 GMT -5
Thanks TG. Zen was experiencing sabot disruption in temps as low as 30 degrees with 65 grn plus loads with out a barrel cooler.Based on this I am going to work up to 64 grns and see how this plays out. I do not if I will improve upon the accuracy or not as it is very accurate at 60 grns. I agree fully... My experience with N120 tells me that 60gns is all that I would ever need...Both accuracy and speed with no worry about blowing sabots...If shooting in higher temperatures [50+] I would probably drop it down to 57-58gns. Zen
|
|
|
Post by edge on Mar 1, 2011 14:20:40 GMT -5
QL would estimate that load at 2830 fps @ 36.3 kpsi and 97% burnt.
Pressure is pretty much in line.
QL would estimate that the bullet left the bore in 1.06 ms and PT estimated the bullet exit pretty close to that on the first shot.
Shot #2 may have partial sabot disruption but that is just a guess.
It would be interesting to see this load 200 grain sabotless to compare velocity and trace shape.
I would probably drop the load before I went up just to see what happened to that second spike.
edge.
|
|
|
Post by Savage Shooter on Mar 1, 2011 15:23:12 GMT -5
I agree with Edge. Would give us sense of direction to drop the load to 63grs and see what the 2nd spike does.
|
|
|
Post by ET on Mar 1, 2011 18:27:58 GMT -5
TGinPA
As always I enjoy following the traces you generate and seeing the results revealed.
Here again I’m scratching my head because of lack of understanding what is occurring.
A secondary spike larger than the primary spike is always seen on the 2nd shot and not on the first shot? The primary spikes for the two shots almost follow the same path of rise and fall never reaching the base line. Then the secondary spike of the second shot dramatically climbs to a higher level than the primary spike. So the obvious question is “What the heck is going on here?”
At this point in time there are 2-things I can see causing this. 1) A false reading? 2) Load has moved far enough ahead from its initial acceleration to expose a larger volume of powder surface to the flame?
Observing the tracking of the of the primary pressure spikes almost on top of each other and pressure curve not reaching zero after the primary spike would suggest correct response from the unit. So if I were to focus on the second reason as a possible answer then the big question is, “What is affecting the bore resistance to allow load movement to increase ahead of the burn on the second shot?”
Here I sort of come to the end of the road for what is occurring.
Ed
|
|
|
Post by TGinPA on Mar 1, 2011 19:47:48 GMT -5
ET: I agree with your analysis. How can I resolve it? PM sent. TG
|
|
|
Post by Savage Shooter on Mar 1, 2011 20:32:31 GMT -5
The 2nd spike is present on almost every load that is being traced in the .45. Even here in linked trace where I am almost positive that powder is not too slow for bullet application. I have no idea what but think something else is happening. Look at link to this trace with 325gr bullet and 4198 @ 53gr......I would think this combo would have NO to very small 2nd spike. It is looking more and more to me like the .45 with 200gr bullet is not making pressure any better or maybe even less than the .50 with 250gr bullets. Looks like burn advantages gained with bore size of the .45 are being more than offset by the lighter bullets. Then look at the trace RB did (scroll down page 2nd link) with N110 with 300gr bullet and again tho not a large spike but it is still there and it for sure is not to light a bullet for the powder. I wish I knew what RB did back when he did this but he told me once he could make about any combo show this symptom with his settings. TGs trace with 4198 @ 53gr and 325ftx in .45 dougsmessageboards.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=smokeless&action=display&thread=7715Quote from RB "Secondary pressures often occur with the items you mention but I'd add there might be other factors in a muzzleloader such as very low bullet inertial resistance with light weight bullets". RBs trace with N110 @ 44gr and 300gr bullet in .50. dougva.proboards.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=Savage&thread=2981&page=1
|
|
|
Post by Dave W on Mar 1, 2011 20:57:09 GMT -5
|
|