|
|
Post by deadeye on Apr 3, 2011 8:10:57 GMT -5
sorry,the h4198/3031 spotless was from the day before(not shot in 25mph-probably** around 10mph-same direction if my memory was correct), #4& 5 were very close to where i left off before the barrel "coppered,however this bullet is the "windbucking king in mz-imo! ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by TGinPA on Apr 4, 2011 12:19:16 GMT -5
Pressure Trace:PN45 RL7 77gr. 325be At Deadeye’ request, with bullets he supplied, I tested the above load. Setup as in previous tests. Barrel Type: PacNor .45 Cal Muzzleloader Barrel OD = 1.06 in Barrel ID = .452 Breech Plug:Savage Std. (screw-in ventliner) ventliner orifice .033 in. Sensor dist fm BP=1.1 in. Bullet Diam.= .449in. Bullet Type = 325be resized to .448in. Bullet weight = 325gr. ,knurled. Sabot: None, Wads: Lubed Wool WW (#4400)over .462x.060 lubed fiber (Cabelas) Powder: Reloder 7 77gr. Primer :Fed 209 Shot fm dirty barrel. This load seemed safe in my barrel under the test conditions but may not be so in other conditions. TG  |
|
|
|
Post by Savage Shooter on Apr 4, 2011 12:25:24 GMT -5
Pressure Trace:PN45 RL7 77gr. 325be At Deadeye’ request, with bullets he supplied, I tested the above load. Setup as in previous tests. Barrel Type: PacNor .45 Cal Muzzleloader Barrel OD = 1.06 in Barrel ID = .452 Breech Plug:Savage Std. (screw-in ventliner) ventliner orifice .033 in. Sensor dist fm BP=1.1 in. Bullet Diam.= .449in. Bullet Type = 325be resized to .448in. Bullet weight = 325gr. ,knurled. Sabot: None, Wads: Lubed Wool WW (#4400)over .462x.060 lubed fiber (Cabelas) Powder: Reloder 7 77gr. Primer :Fed 209 Shot fm dirty barrel. This load seemed safe in my barrel under the test conditions but may not be so in other conditions. TG Excellent potential and some room to still shoot a touch more powder if desired sabotless. |
|
|
|
Post by deadeye on Apr 4, 2011 14:29:19 GMT -5
tg-thx again, ss- it appears so far in limited testing 76.0gns was the accurate load w/ r7/327be. i went out last night approx midnight to actually measure that 3 shot which i just eyeballed earlier-indeed it was actually .5 for what ever thats worth.
i think it will boil down to es reading's for the pick of the litter here & the r7 has not been shot with the same vent as h4198/3031.
think et was right on the pressure curve eroding the vents,just something i will have to deal with-no big deal.
|
|
|
|
Post by deadeye on Apr 15, 2011 19:27:17 GMT -5
since this question was asked on another thread-i will add it here for quick-reference for record actual field results with a sight height of 1.86'' @ 4''high zero@ 204yds=mv 2626fps/327be* elevation* 915 with the above data the true el bc to approx 450yds= .430 500yds= .420 600yds= .405 665yds= .395 bc interesting data with above sight-in* actual drop@ 500yds= 4ft @ 600yds=7.5ft @ 665yds=10.3ft mr. parker after my last order called me back approx 1 hr later & asked me to repeat again what i said earlier- i said -*it appears at this time in my testing this bullet 325be has a wind deflection bc of approx .6 bc//traj-.430,i have never seen this out of any bullets including cf vld type bullets & such where the deflection bc was much higher than the trajectory given bc & i have flown many @ 1,000yds plus. after going back through all the data in this thread(my notes) that deflection bc is absouletly "confirmed"  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 16, 2011 9:01:27 GMT -5
Deadeye,
Are you going to try the 327's,is Parker going to make both the 325 and the 327's. Has he made the ultimate BC bullet? He ought to throw a few bullets your way for the great "REAL" testing that your doing. I as well as others commend you on your efforts we are waiting for more results.
Are the 275's just too light or what? I assume heavier stabilizes better at long ranges.
Thanks again,
Greenhorn
|
|
|
|
Post by deadeye on Apr 16, 2011 15:24:38 GMT -5
Deadeye, Are you going to try the 327's,is Parker going to make both the 325 and the 327's. Has he made the ultimate BC bullet? He ought to throw a few bullets your way for the great "REAL" testing that your doing. I as well as others commend you on your efforts we are waiting for more results. Are the 275's just too light or what? I assume heavier stabilizes better at long ranges. Thanks again, Greenhorn greenhorn- it is my understanding they still are packaged(sold-name) as 325be but actually are 327's(new improved)my last are actually the 327's as i ran out of old stock. i did notice very early per my notes about the deflection & have noticed the approx .6 even at the speeds of approx 2250fps which is one of the first posted loads of 53.0/h4198 to start this thread in winds of 18mph-27mph winds. i backtracked all my notes including mil-holds & such looking for something to discount my finding's-all in line. i would suspect this deflection has something to do with the angle from the tip to shoulder of bullet possibly something majical??? i don' t know but i know the results i'm witnessing. i told mr parker i would eventually get back to him on our final loads & probably will do so this coming week. today with another friend of mine's (.45 pac) 76.0gns of r7 looks to be dialed in also with speeds of approx 2650fps w/327be/es @ 27. with no disrespect to the 275be in which i took prior out to 488yds-there is no contest on wind deflection between the two or any mz bullet i have flown for that matter. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 18, 2011 15:54:21 GMT -5
Thanks for clearing that up about the 327. Man, I've got to get in the sabotless game!!! Amazing results for mls.
Waiting for more updates,
Greenhorn
|
|
